• office locations
     
    Bluffton, SC map
    Bluffton, SC Office
    The Plaza at Belfair
    4 Clarks Summit Drive
    Suite 200 | Bluffton, SC 29910-4993
    843.815.2171  Main | 843.815.5991  Fax
     
    Charleston, SC map
    Charleston, SC Office
    100 Calhoun Street
    Suite 400 | Charleston, SC 29401
    843.723.7831  Main | 843.722.3227  Fax
     
    Charlotte, NC map
    Charlotte, NC Office
    Bank of America Plaza
    101 South Tryon Street
    Suite 2610 | Charlotte, NC 28280
    704.347.1170  Main | 704.347.4467  Fax
     
    Columbia, SC map
    Columbia, SC Office
    1221 Main Street
    Suite 1800 | Columbia, SC 29201
    803.799.9800  Main | 803.753.3278  Fax
     
    Greenville, SC map
    Greenville, SC Office
    Poinsett Plaza
    104 South Main Street
    Suite 700 | Greenville, SC 29601
    864.271.4940  Main | 864.271.4015  Fax
     
    Hilton Head Is., SC map
    Hilton Head Island, SC Office
    Shelter Cove Executive Park
    23-B Shelter Cove Lane
    Suite 400 | Hilton Head Island, SC 29928
    843.785.2171  Main | 843.686.5991  Fax
     
    Myrtle Beach, SC map
    Myrtle Beach, SC Office
    Founders Centre
    2411 Oak Street
    Suite 206 | Myrtle Beach, SC 29577
    843.444.1107  Main | 843.444.4729  Fax
     
    Pawleys Island, SC map
    Pawleys Island, SC Office
    11019 Ocean Highway
    Pawleys Island, SC 29585
    843.235.4100  Main | 843.235.4101  Fax
     
  • contact us
      No   Yes  
PROFESSIONALS OTHER CONTENT
     

News Room

Print
Share

Fourth Circuit Rules that Employers Must Accommodate Temporary Conditions Under the ADAFebruary 6, 2014

Related Information

Practices

Locations

EMPLOYMENT LAW ALERT

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, which handles federal appeals from South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia, West Virginia, and Maryland, recently held that the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") covers temporary conditions, if sufficiently severe.

For years, it was settled law that the ADA applied only to chronic conditions like blindness, deafness, paraplegia, and other lifelong impairments. In 2008, however, Congress passed the ADA Amendments Act, which vastly expanded the definition of "disability."  Until a few days ago, it was unclear whether this expanded definition would be read to capture temporary conditions. 

In a January 23, 2014 decision, the Fourth Circuit ruled that "a sufficiently severe temporary impairment may constitute a disability," reversing a district court's dismissal of an ADA action brought by an employee who suffered from multiple fractured bones and torn tendons.  According to the Court, interpreting the ADA to cover such conditions is appropriate in light of congressional intent to "expand the scope of protection available under the [ADA] as broadly as the text permits."

In the case at issue, Carl Summers, an employee of Altarum Institute, a Virginia-based government contractor, fell getting off of a commuter train, fracturing bones and tearing tendons in both legs.  His injuries required surgery, and he was not permitted to put weight on his left leg for six weeks.  He was also told that it would likely be seven months before he could walk normally.

Shortly after his injury, Summers contacted Altarum HR to discuss returning to work, and he proposed a plan by which he would work remotely from home for a period of time and gradually transition back to being in the office fulltime.  Altarum did not respond to this proposal, instead terminating Summers approximately six weeks after his injury.

Summers brought claims against Altarum for failing to accommodate his condition and for disability discrimination under the ADA.  The district court dismissed the claims, stating that because Summers's condition was temporary and he was expected to recover, his injuries did not rise to the level of a protected disability.  The Fourth Circuit disagreed and reinstated his claims, holding that his injuries were severe enough to constitute a disability, even if they were not permanent.  The Court lambasted Altarum for not making any effort to accommodate Summers's condition.

This decision confirms that the ADA now covers some severe temporary conditions, and that employers are expected to accommodate such conditions where possible.  Determining whether a temporary condition is severe enough to rise to the level of an ADA-covered disability is difficult, as the Court did not provide substantial guidance on that point.  In light of the decision, employers should approach temporary conditions as potential disabilities, and should focus their attention on whether such conditions can be reasonably accommodated.  Managers should be trained to refer employees with such conditions to HR for consistent handling, rather than attempting to make accommodation decisions on their own.